Why compliance does not guarantee cyber resilience
The compliance-versus-resilience debate is evergreen, but with NIS2 and DORA demanding operational resilience evidence, European enterprises must close the gap between audit artefacts and tested incident-response capability.
Summary written by editorial AI · Source link below
Cyber security has become one of the most audited and regulated areas of enterprise technology. Yet an organisation can satisfy every requirement on paper and still discover, during a real incident, that its systems, people or processes are not ready for the pressure that follows. Compliance can demonstrate that controls have been put in place; […] The post Why compliance does not guarantee cyber resilience appeared first on IT Security Guru .
Editorial Analysis
As NIS2 and DORA enforcement begins, regulators will look beyond checkbox compliance; organisations that cannot demonstrate tested resilience face both regulatory and operational risk.
Schedule a resilience-focused tabletop exercise that targets gaps between documented controls and actual incident-response performance.
Passing audits is not the same as surviving an attack — upcoming EU regulations will penalise the difference.
Forward-looking interpretation drafted by editorial AI under human review — not a reproduction of the source. See methodology.
External link — opens at IT Security Guru in a new tab.
More from the Compliance Desk
- Compliance teams have gone continuous, but their evidence-gathering hasn’t caught up3d
- Population-Calibrated Graph Screening at 835-Million-Address Scale, with Label-Free Transfer to New Chains4d
- French hospital fined €500,000 after breach exposes data of 727,0004d
- Identification of Compositional Risks in Data Protection Impact Assessments and Beyond6d
- You Know GDPR Is Good Based on Who Hates It29 Aug